The Influence of Consciousness on Matter
KOROTKOV
The question of whether the
human mind can directly,
without some intermediate
elements, influence the world
around us has troubled
mankind since ancient times.
human mind can directly,
without some intermediate
elements, influence the world
around us has troubled
mankind since ancient times.
This effect is described in countless myths,
legends and fairy tales of all peoples. In XX
century this question arose on the new
plane when the concept of the “observer” on
whose conscious actions the outcome of
subatomic events depended was introduced
in quantum mechanics. Such interpretation
is not universally accepted by physicists but
it provides a theoretical foundation for study
of these phenomena.
It is interesting to note that in techniques,
especially in computer sciences, there is a
c o m m o n o p i n i o n t h a t t h e r e a r e
experimenters in whose hands any
instrument works, and there are people
negatively affecting the equipment. The first
were Lord Kelvin, Thomas Edison and
Nikola Tesla. The latter are usually theorists.
A famous physicist George Gamow
humorously describes the so-called “Pauli
effect”7:
“It is well known that theoretical physicists
are very awkward in handling experimental
apparatus; and furthermore, the level of
physicist – theorist can be assessed by his
ability to break a delicate instrument byt
simply touching it. According to this criterion,
Wolfgang Pauli was an outstanding
theoretician; the equipment broke, fell,
blocked or burned as soon as he entered
the lab”.
Naturally, this is a joke, and such
influence is not exerted by all theorists,
but as with every joke, there is a large
element of truth there.
legends and fairy tales of all peoples. In XX
century this question arose on the new
plane when the concept of the “observer” on
whose conscious actions the outcome of
subatomic events depended was introduced
in quantum mechanics. Such interpretation
is not universally accepted by physicists but
it provides a theoretical foundation for study
of these phenomena.
It is interesting to note that in techniques,
especially in computer sciences, there is a
c o m m o n o p i n i o n t h a t t h e r e a r e
experimenters in whose hands any
instrument works, and there are people
negatively affecting the equipment. The first
were Lord Kelvin, Thomas Edison and
Nikola Tesla. The latter are usually theorists.
A famous physicist George Gamow
humorously describes the so-called “Pauli
effect”7:
“It is well known that theoretical physicists
are very awkward in handling experimental
apparatus; and furthermore, the level of
physicist – theorist can be assessed by his
ability to break a delicate instrument byt
simply touching it. According to this criterion,
Wolfgang Pauli was an outstanding
theoretician; the equipment broke, fell,
blocked or burned as soon as he entered
the lab”.
Naturally, this is a joke, and such
influence is not exerted by all theorists,
but as with every joke, there is a large
element of truth there.
THE FIELD APPROACH
Comments
Post a Comment